01 · BASELINE
Measured starting point
The completed Operating Diagnostic on the table — or run first inside the engagement. The score, the tax and the drivers set the design priorities.
OPERATE / COMMAND BLUEPRINT
The operating architecture, before the operating change.
The Command Blueprint designs how the company runs with less routed through one person: systems, workflows, decision rights, agent roles, and a sequenced 90-day plan — priced, staged, and written so any competent team could execute it. From $7,500.
Services / Command Blueprint
WHAT IT IS
Architecture first. Here too.
An Enterprise Build settles architecture before anyone writes feature code, because that is the expensive part to change later. The Blueprint applies the same order to the company itself: before any system is changed, any agent given work, or any workflow moved, the target operating model is written down precisely enough to argue with.
It starts from a measured baseline. Bring a completed Operating Diagnostic; where there is none, it is run first inside the engagement — that is part of what "from" covers. Designing an operating change against a self-reported number is how transformations get built on flattery.
The design covers the whole loop: a systems map from current to target, the Company Graph for this company — entities, relationships, permissions — a workflow inventory with every recurring piece of work assigned a target owner (system, agent, or human), decision rights with explicit thresholds and escalation paths, and governance for every agent role: permissions, escalation, and what evidence each action must leave.
The output is deliberately portable. It names what to build and what to buy, in what order, at what cost — and it is written so it can be executed with us, with your own team, or with someone else entirely. A plan that only works if you hire its author is a proposal wearing a plan’s clothes.
HOW IT RUNS
How the Blueprint runs.
02 · DESIGN
Target operating model
Systems map, Company Graph, and the workflow inventory: every recurring piece of work assigned to system, agent, or human, deliberately.
03 · GOVERN
Decision rights and agent governance
What gets decided by rule, what escalates and to whom, and for each agent role: permissions, thresholds, escalation, and required evidence.
04 · SEQUENCE
The 90-day plan
The change ordered into priced, staged steps — with a target score delta and a re-score date, so the plan is falsifiable.
WHAT YOU GET
Concrete deliverables.
You receive
- A current-to-target systems map: what stays, what goes, what gets connected
- The Company Graph design for this company: entities, relationships, identity, permissions
- A workflow inventory with a target owner — system, agent, or human — for every recurring piece of work
- Decision rights and thresholds: what is decided by rule, what escalates, to whom
And also
- Agent role definitions with governance: permissions, escalation paths, and the evidence every action must leave
- A sequenced 90-day dependency-reduction plan with a target score delta and a re-score date
- A priced, staged implementation scope — executable by us, by your team, or by someone else
FIT
Who this is for — and who it is not.
A good fit when
- A measured diagnostic put the score at 41 or higher, and there are resources to act within a quarter
- One decision-maker can approve the design and settle disagreements about decision rights
- The intent is to change how the company runs, not only which software it runs
Not the right call when
- The plan is wanted to validate a decision already made. The design follows the evidence, including where the evidence is inconvenient.
- Decision rights are off the table. Moving software while every approval still routes through one person moves the furniture, not the score.
- Implementation is demanded before design. Changing systems first and understanding the operating model later is how the patchwork happened.
- The organization needs a transformation office, a steering committee and a two-year program. This is architecture for owner-led companies, not enterprise consulting.
FAQ
Good questions.
Why "from $7,500"? What moves the number?
The floor covers a single-entity company arriving with a completed diagnostic. The number moves with entity count, workflow count, how much regulated ground the design must cover, and whether the diagnostic runs inside the engagement. It is priced in writing before design starts.
Do we have to implement it with EVERJUST?
No, and the document is written to make that a real option: it names systems, sequence and cost in terms any competent team can execute. If you do implement with us, the plan maps directly onto EVERJUST.APP, CustomAgents and, where real construction is needed, an Enterprise Build.
Is the Operating Diagnostic required first?
A measured baseline is, because designing against self-reported numbers produces flattering architecture. Bring a completed diagnostic, or it runs as the first stage of the Blueprint and the price reflects that.
How long does it take?
Scope decides — entity count and workflow count dominate. The working window is fixed at intake, in writing, alongside the price. What is fixed by design is the output: the plan ends 90 days after implementation starts, at a re-score.
PRICING
From $7,500 / fixed scope
Design the operating change.
Systems, workflows, decision rights, agents, and a 90-day plan with a re-score date. From $7,500.
Start the Blueprint ↗No discovery calls.
No proposals.
No hours.